<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Steve the Math Tutor &#187; Differential Calculus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.themathtutor.co.nz/tag/differential-calculus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.themathtutor.co.nz</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2018 00:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-AU</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.25</generator>

	 
	<item>
		<title>The Constant of Integration: do I need it or not?</title>
		<link>http://www.themathtutor.co.nz/2015/02/28/the-constant-of-integration-do-i-need-it-or-not/</link>
		<comments>http://www.themathtutor.co.nz/2015/02/28/the-constant-of-integration-do-i-need-it-or-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2015 10:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorised]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Differential Calculus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integral Calculus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themathtutor.co.nz/?p=210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When we&#8217;re integrating sometimes it seems we need to do the +c thing and sometimes we don&#8217;t. What&#8217;s the story? Do we need it or not? So the short answer is: Yes, you need it. The slightly longer answer is: Yes, you need it for the indefinite integral but you can safely ignore it if &#8230; <a href="http://www.themathtutor.co.nz/2015/02/28/the-constant-of-integration-do-i-need-it-or-not/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">The Constant of Integration: do I need it or not?</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.themathtutor.co.nz/2015/02/28/the-constant-of-integration-do-i-need-it-or-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tricky old Quotient Rule</title>
		<link>http://www.themathtutor.co.nz/2015/02/23/tricky-old-quotient-rule/</link>
		<comments>http://www.themathtutor.co.nz/2015/02/23/tricky-old-quotient-rule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2015 22:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorised]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arithmetic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Differential Calculus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themathtutor.co.nz/?p=143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How come I&#8217;m always stuffing it up when I use the quotient rule? Product rule is ok. They&#8217;re pretty much the same, right? Well, yes and no. They are very similar. Let&#8217;s have a look: They are similar but the Product Rule has much more &#8216;give&#8217; in it. It is much more forgiving of a &#8230; <a href="http://www.themathtutor.co.nz/2015/02/23/tricky-old-quotient-rule/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Tricky old Quotient Rule</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.themathtutor.co.nz/2015/02/23/tricky-old-quotient-rule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
